It is important to approach the question of the "deadliest" martial art with caution and recognize that the effectiveness of a martial art depends on various factors. Martial arts are primarily practiced for self-defense, physical fitness, personal development, and cultural preservation rather than for causing harm or engaging in lethal combat.


The effectiveness of a martial art in a self-defense or combat scenario depends on multiple variables, including the practitioner's skill level, physical attributes, situational factors, and the specific context of the encounter. It is the skill and proficiency of the practitioner, rather than the martial art itself, that largely determines the outcome of a physical confrontation.


Moreover, many martial arts prioritize discipline, respect, and the avoidance of unnecessary violence. They focus on techniques for disabling or neutralizing an opponent without causing significant harm. Martial arts also emphasize nonviolent conflict resolution, evasion, and de-escalation whenever possible.


Instead of seeking the "deadliest" martial art, it is more beneficial to consider martial arts that provide effective self-defense training, physical conditioning, personal growth, and a supportive training environment. Some martial arts that are commonly recognized for their practical self-defense applications include Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Krav Maga, Muay Thai, Boxing, Judo, and Filipino Martial Arts (Kali/Eskrima/Arnis). However, it is essential to remember that the effectiveness of any martial art depends on the individual practitioner's dedication, training, and application of techniques, rather than the martial art itself being inherently "deadly."